honestly, i don't think it's so slimy of them to advert their own editing services. probably the majority of ms they receive suck balls, grammar- and style-wise.
an ethical issue may arise if editing is their bread and butter, while acting as agent accounts for only a small part of their revenue. it would indicate that the agency serves as a front for the real editing business. (a sure way to sucker a bunch of naive writers.)
is it possible to investigate these individuals to see how many ms they have sold before calling them out as scammers? who knows, maybe they are just a bunch of hucksters.
"Failure is the New Funny. Whether you're a writer ... or a bookworm ... Literary Rejections on Display is worth checking out."
The Boston Phoenix Rises
"Might we suggest whiling away the hours with Literary Rejections On Display? We've been hooked for the last couple of weeks..."
LROD On The Couch
"An author who, like the rest of us, experiences many more rejections than acceptances."
Blogher Offers a Female Nod
"And since something isn't really something until there's a blog about it, I give you Literary Rejections on Display."
Gawker Gawks LROD
"A reminder of the competitive pressures that help drive some authors to start plagiarizing and making things up."
GALLEYCAT Chimes In
"Excellent blog."
Poets & Writers Questions LROD
"Isn't it part of the writer's job to learn from--rather than reject--rejection?"
HTML GIANT Confesses
"I am sort of addicted to this site. I go through phases: I check it regularly, then I stop myself and ignore it for several months. Then I remember it again and sift through its wreckage."
The Village Voice Bitches About LROD
"Deliberately composed of unpublished individuals who wear their rejection slips as badges of integrity."
5 comments:
A bridge in brooklyn?
$43, huh? My, how generous.
How nice-- they don't charge reading fees!
May you help? No ... no you may not help.
honestly, i don't think it's so slimy of them to advert their own editing services. probably the majority of ms they receive suck balls, grammar- and style-wise.
an ethical issue may arise if editing is their bread and butter, while acting as agent accounts for only a small part of their revenue. it would indicate that the agency serves as a front for the real editing business. (a sure way to sucker a bunch of naive writers.)
is it possible to investigate these individuals to see how many ms they have sold before calling them out as scammers? who knows, maybe they are just a bunch of hucksters.
Post a Comment